Tax Class III/V or IV/IV — Which Is Better?
Almost every married couple asks this question at some point. The short answer is: it depends — above all on the ratio between the two incomes and on whether you prefer more money each month or want to avoid a back payment. The long answer is provided by this article.
So you are not fishing in the dark, it is worth looking at the concrete figures first: the <a href="/steuerklassen-rechner">tax class calculator</a> shows for your salaries which combination yields the highest combined monthly net and how large the difference really is.
How IV/IV works
With the IV/IV combination both partners are treated as if they were single. Each keeps their full basic allowance, each pays wage tax under the regular tariff on their own income. This variant is the default setting after marriage. Its big advantage: it is even and usually does not lead to a back payment, because the withheld wage tax already comes quite close to the later annual tax.
How III/V works
With III/V the balance of power shifts. The partner in class III gets the doubled basic allowance and pays little wage tax each month. The partner in class V has no basic allowance in the payslip and therefore pays disproportionately much. This combination only makes sense if the higher earner takes class III — because then the relief effect is greatest.
The decisive factor: the income ratio
Whether III/V brings more than IV/IV depends almost exclusively on how unequally the incomes are distributed. As a rule of thumb: only from a ratio of about 60:40 in favour of one partner does III/V pay off noticeably. If one partner earns 4,500 euros and the other 1,800 euros, the monthly liquidity advantage is clear. If both earn 3,000 euros each, it is practically absent — here IV/IV is the better choice.
Why the annual tax stays identical
A widespread misconception is that III/V saves tax overall. That is not true. For jointly assessed married couples the tax is calculated via income splitting, and this result is entirely independent of the chosen wage tax class. The class choice only determines the level of the monthly advance payment. At year-end the tax return balances everything out again — either as a refund or as a back payment.
Pros and cons at a glance
In favour of III/V: more net per month when incomes are unequal, which can help with running loans, for example. Against it: obligation to file a return, risk of a back payment and a very low net for the partner in class V. In favour of IV/IV: even distribution, rarely a back payment, no filing obligation just because of the class choice. The only argument against is the slightly lower combined monthly net with unequal incomes.
And the factor method?
Anyone who wants the higher liquidity of III/V but fears the back payment should look at the factor method. It combines the fair distribution of IV/IV with an individually calculated factor, so that the monthly deductions are already close to the annual tax. For many couples this is the best compromise.
Conclusion
There is no blanket "better". IV/IV is even and uncomplicated, III/V brings more monthly liquidity with unequal incomes but back-payment risk. The annual tax stays the same in both cases. Work through your specific case in the <a href="/steuerklassen-rechner">tax class calculator</a> before you decide.
